Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
Volume: 2 Issue: 2 December 2004 - Supplement - 1

FULL TEXT

COMPARISON OF TACROLIMUS VERSUS C2 MONITORIZED CYCLOSPORIN IMMUNOSUPPRESSION, AKDENIZ UNIVERSITY EXPERIENCE

The study was planned to investigate and compare the demographic features and clinical data of 114 renal transplant recipients receiving tacrolimus (TAC) (group I, n=59 patients) or C-2 monitorized cyclosporin (group II, n=55 patients), during a two-year period (2000-2002). Acute and chronic rejection episodes, patient and graft loss, posttransplant (post-tx) diabetes mellitus (DM) and hypertension (HT) rates were compared in these two groups. In both groups demographic features (age: 37.3±9.5 vs 33.8±10 years,gender: male/female:45/14 vs 35/20, donor type: living-related/cadaveric: 27/32 vs 33/22) were similar. Also no statistical significance was observed in terms of acute (12/59 vs 5/55) or chronic (1/59 vs 1/51) rejection rates and 1st year and last serum creatinine levels (1.2±0.39 vs 1.3±0.4, 1.3±0.4vs 1.4± 0.3, respectively). Post-tx DM and HT rates were similar in both groups. Although there was no patient and graft loss in group II, death (n=6: secondary to infection; CMV in 2, cardiovascular event in 2, PTLD secondary to EBV in 1 and suicide in 1 patient) and graft loss ( n=9 secondary to death in 5, recurrence of primary disease in 1, primary nonfunction in 2 and acute rejection in 1 patient) were seen in group I. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed that graft survival (1st year: 89%, 2nd year: 82% in group I and 1st year: 100%, 2nd year: 100 % in group II; LogRank: 0.005) and patient survival (1st year: 91%, 2nd year: 91% in group I and 1st year: 100%, 2nd year: 100 % in group II; LogRank: 0.027) rates were superior in group II.
Our results show that C-2 monitorized cyclosporine regimen appears to be safer in terms of acute rejection and leads to improved survival rates.



Volume : 2
Issue : 2
Pages : 104


PDF VIEW [7] KB.