Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
Volume: 21 Issue: 3 March 2023

FULL TEXT

CASE REPORT
Successful Completion of Left Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Donor Nephrectomy in a Patient with Duplicated Inferior Vena Cava: Case Report and Review of Literature

Duplication of the inferior vena cava is a rare vascular anomaly that increases the complexity of living donor nephrectomy and subsequent transplant. We present the case of a successful left-side laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy performed in a donor with a duplicated inferior vena cava. The length of the left renal vein was adequate for anastomosis in the recipient, with no late surgical complications at 9 months for both donor and recipient. Duplicated inferior vena cava is not a contraindication for left kidney transplant. Preoperative assessment and planning with computed tomography angiography are essential. Laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy can be performed safely in patients with duplicated inferior vena cava.


Key words : Computed tomography angiography, Infrarenal duplicated inferior vena cava, Left kidney transplant, Vascular dissection

Introduction

Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) has become the standard surgery to procure kidneys for transplant.1 The LDN procedure requires a major vascular dissection and is a technically challenging procedure.2 Laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy (LESS-DN) has the added advantages of a smaller incision, better scar satisfaction, less need for analgesics, and shorter recovery time for return to work versus conventional LDN.3

Vascular anomalies increase the difficulty and complication of the donor LDN procedure for surgeons. Duplicated inferior vena cava (IVC) is a relatively rare vascular anomaly with a reported prevalence of 0.5% to 3%.2,4-6

The inclusion of donors with anatomic variants permits the expansion of the donor pool. Herein, we report a case of successful left LESS-DN in a donor with an infrarenal duplicated IVC.1

Case Report

A 32-year-old male patient was evaluated as a potential kidney donor for his 50-year-old sister, who was on hemodialysis for 3 years due to hypertension. The donor had no significant medical history. After an extensive medical and psychological evaluation, the brother was approved for donation. Results of blood and urine tests were within reference ranges, and ultrasonography revealed kidneys of typical size and no anomalies. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) renal angiography showed healthy functional kidneys and simple collecting systems without duplication. However, there was a duplicated IVC below the level of the left renal vein (Figure 1). The left renal vein was longer than the right renal vein (68 mm vs 29 mm, respectively). The kidneys were measured by volume rendering on CT, and both kidneys were similar in size. There were bilateral single renal arteries.

Informed consent was obtained from both the donor and the recipient. The donor was prepared for surgery in a 45-degree flank position, and a 5-cm-long vertical transumbilical incision was made, including 1 cm above and 1 cm below the umbilicus. We performed LESS-DN using a laparoscopic system (GelPort, Applied Medical), followed by the insertion of one 12-mm trocar and two 10-mm trocars through the port. We used conventional laparoscopic instruments and a 30-degree angled camera system and followed the conventional steps of LDN to enter the abdomen. The left adrenal vein drained at the junction between the left renal vein and the IVC. Additionally, the lumber left gonadal vein and the left renal vein drained into the left IVC. We carefully dissected the left IVC and all tributaries. When we received notification that the recipient was ready, we proceeded with the extraction. The ureter was clipped and divided. Then, a 5-mm lumbar port was inserted, and the renal artery and the vein were cut with a powered vascular stapler (Echelon Flex, Ethicon). The graft was extracted via a retrieval bag after the 12-mm port was replaced with a 15-mm port. Finally, the GelPort apparatus was reinserted for hemostasis.3 The warm ischemia time was 2.5 minutes, and the operation time was 155 minutes (Figure 2).

Renal transplant was performed with good perfusion and immediate graft function. The donor had an uncomplicated postoperative course and was discharged in good condition 2 days after the operation. The recipient was discharged on posto-perative day 6 with normal renal function. Both donor and recipient remain alive with good renal function and without late surgical complications at 9 months.

Discussion

The intrauterine development of the IVC occurs with the emergence and regression of the posterior cardinal, subcardinal, and supracardinal veins during the period from week 7 through week 10 of gestation.7,8 The anomalous persistence of the right and left supracardinal veins results in IVC duplication.9 In a duplicated IVC, the common iliac veins fail to unite. There are 2 main types of duplicated IVC. In the most common variety, both IVC vessels ascend on either side of the abdominal aorta. The left-side vessel crosses anterior to the aorta at the level of the renal veins to join the right-side IVC.10

Anatomic variations can increase complications, operative time, and ischemia time and subsequently could affect the success rate of the surgical procedure.9,11 Preoperative CT angiography is a reliable method for detection of arterial and venous anomalies.11 Therefore, the venous phase of CT angiography is an essential step to determine the anatomy of the left renal vein tributaries.7,12 Most bleeding during LDN occurs due to injury of tributaries of the left renal vein rather than injury to the vein itself. If there is a left-side IVC, then other anatomic variations should be suspected. Therefore, careful dissection and awareness of further venous variations are pertinent.7

Scrotal edema has been described in some cases of donor nephrectomy in patients with duplicated IVC.11 Donors should be informed of this possible complication prior to surgery.

In donors with duplicated IVC, both open and laparoscopic approaches have been reported. Davari and colleagues described 2 cases of open nephrectomy in donors with left infrarenal duplicated IVC. In the first case, a left infrarenal IVC was removed due to complications by mild edema around the pelvis girdle and proximal left thigh that had persisted for 2 weeks. In the second case, the left renal vein was divided more proximally with a good short renal vein to preserve the continuity of the left IVC.5

Moreover, several laparoscopic approaches have been previously described. Christakis and colleagues have reported a conventional left-side LDN. Their patient presented with persistent painful left scrotal edema and associated bilateral hydroceles, which resulted in 2 emergency room visits.6 Additionally, successful retroperitoneoscopic and hand-assisted and laparoscopic approaches have been reported.1,2,12

This report is the first to describe pure left LESS-DN in a donor with a duplicated IVC. The complete duplicated IVC was exposed, and the nephrectomy was performed safely. There were no complications due to the vascular anomaly.

Conclusions

Donors with anomalous venous anatomy can be safely offered LDN by surgeons with appropriate laparoscopic experience and access to adequate modern radiologic imaging, with a focus on venous phase CT angiography.


References:

  1. Pal BC, Modi PR, Rizvi SJ, et al. Pure retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy in duplication of inferior vena cava: a series of four cases. Urol Ann. 2017;9(4):335-338. doi:10.4103/UA.UA_59_17
    CrossRef - PubMed
  2. Wu CT, Chiang YJ, Liu KL, Chu SH. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy in a patient with duplex inferior vena cava. Transplant Proc. 2004;36(7):1912-1913. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2004.08.097
    CrossRef - PubMed
  3. El Hennawy HM, Al Hashemy A, Kadi NM, et al. Transumbilical laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy: evolving trends. Surg Endosc. 2019;33(6):1920-1926. doi:10.1007/s00464-018-6474-8
    CrossRef - PubMed
  4. Nakatani T, Kim T, Naganuma T, Uchida J, Takemoto Y, Sugimura K. Kidney transplants from living related donors having double inferior vena cava. Urol Int. 2004;72(4):358-360. doi:10.1159/000077695
    CrossRef - PubMed
  5. Davari HR, Malek-Hosseini SA, Salahi H, et al. Management of infrarenal duplicated inferior vena cava during living related kidney transplantation. Transpl Int. 2007;20(5):478-479. doi:10.1111/j.1432-2277.2007.00456.x
    CrossRef - PubMed
  6. Christakis PG, Cimsit B, Kulkarni S. Complication arising from a duplicated inferior vena cava following laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a case report. Transplant Proc. 2012;44(5):1450-1452. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2011.11.064
    CrossRef - PubMed
  7. Whooley J, Ferede A, Smyth G, Little D. Venous anomalies in renal transplantation: an accessory left-sided IVC in a live kidney donor. BMJ Case Rep. 2019;12(12):e232695. doi:10.1136/bcr-2019-232695
    CrossRef - PubMed
  8. Chuang VP, Mena CE, Hoskins PA. Congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava. Review of embryogenesis and presentation of a simplified classification. Br J Radiol. 1974;47(556):206-213. doi:10.1259/0007-1285-47-556-206
    CrossRef - PubMed
  9. Rizvi SJ, Prasad TK, Modi PR. Retroperitoneoscopic left donor nephrectomy with duplicated IVC. Indian J Nephrol. 2012;22(6):480-481. doi:10.4103/0971-4065.106054
    CrossRef - PubMed
  10. Ang WC, Doyle T, Stringer MD. Left-sided and duplicate inferior vena cava: a case series and review. Clin Anat. 2013;26(8):990-1001. doi:10.1002/ca.22090
    CrossRef - PubMed
  11. Kirecci SL, Demir M, Ilgi M, Battal M, Dokucu AI, Unsal A. Anatomic diversity encountered during laparoscopic hand-assisted transperitoneal donor nephrectomy: a case report of complete caval duplication. Transplant Proc. 2017;49(3):613-615. doi:10.1016/j.transproceed.2017.01.038
    CrossRef - PubMed
  12. Fronek JP, Morsy MA, Singh U, Chemla E, Chang RW. Retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy in a patient with a double inferior vena cava. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2006;16(4):378-380. doi:10.1089/lap.2006.16.378
    CrossRef - PubMed


Volume : 21
Issue : 3
Pages : 272 - 274
DOI : 10.6002/ect.2023.0009


PDF VIEW [866] KB.
FULL PDF VIEW

From the 1Surgery Department, Section of Transplantation, the 2Urology Department, Armed Forces Hospitals Southern Region, Khamis Mushayte; the 3Urology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Al-Azhar University, Cairo; the 4Radiology Department, Armed Forces Hospitals Southern Region, Khamis Mushayte; the 5Radiology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt; the 6Nephrology Department, and the 7Pharmacy Department, Armed Forces Hospitals Southern Region, Khamis Mushayte, Saudi Arabia
Acknowledgements: The authors have not received any funding or grants in support of the presented research or for the preparation of this work and have no declarations of potential conflicts of interest.
Corresponding author: Hany M. El Hennawy, Department of Surgery, Section of Transplantation, Armed Forces Hospitals Southern Region, Khamis Mushayte, 101, Saudi Arabia
Phone: +996 503 081 770
E-mail:hennawyhany@hotmail.com