Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
Volume: 14 Issue: 1 February 2016

FULL TEXT

REVIEW
Humanized Monoclonal Antibody Alemtuzumab Treatment in Transplant

Successful attenuation of allograft rejection rate is amajor clinical aspect in transplant. The CD52 binding monoclonal antibody CAMPATH1 or alemtuzumab, in this aspect, shows a promise as an effective immunomodifier. This humanized monoclonal anti body efficiently depletes CD52-bearing mature B- and T lymphocytes from circulation and thereby causes transient lymphopenia, a condition for generalized immunosuppression. Alemtuzumab is an approved drug for the treatment of B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia. However, its implication in transplant as nonsteroidal drug is a growing area of investigation. Here, we provided a brief account on alemtuzumab as an immunomodifier in allotrans plant.


Key words : Alemtuzumab, CD52, Transplant, Antibody, Monoclonal, Lymphocyte

Introduction

Alemtuzumab (commercially known as CAMPATH or Lemtrada) is a humanized monoclonal antibody raised against CD52, a membrane bound cell surface marker (21-28 kDa) found primarily on B and T lymphocytes. The abundance of CD52 is small to moderate in macrophages, monocytes, and natural killer cells.1-4 The stem cells, erythrocytes or platelets express little CD52, thus do not efficiently respond to the drug.5 The introduction of alemtuzumab in transplant along with broad-spectrum antibiotics is a new way of treatment strategy adding to existing steroid therapy. The vision for developing treatment approach using monoclonal antibodies in general, has several targeted aims: (a) induction of antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity (ADCC): immuno therapeutic strategy for cancer; (b) induction of antitoxin: vaccination strategy to neutralize effect of toxin and microbial infection; (c) attenuation of adverse effect of self antigen during autoimmune diseases by successful depletion of autoantigen; and (d) maintenance of peripheral tolerance by attenuating graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) in allogenic transplant.

In Figure 1, we described the targeted use of alemtuzumab as immunomodifier in transplant therapy.

Alemtuzumab interacts with CD52 cell surface marker
CD52 is a glycophosphatidylinositol phosphate (GPI) anchored transmembrane protein.6 The demonstrated evidence suggests that, CD52 along with other GPI anchored proteins CD55 and CD59, regulate cell proliferation in in B cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia.5,7 The drug induces the caspase independent apoptotic signal pathway.8-11 The crosslinking of membrane bound CD52 induces intracellular signaling to apoptosis. On the other hand, the emergence of soluble CD52 in circulation initiates different signaling events to activate classic complement cascade through C1q activation and facilitates formation of immune complex.12-14 The GPI anchored cell surface proteins CD59, CD55, CD46, and CD35 regulate the complement cascade activation pathways.15,16 Recent investigations indicate that the monoclonal antibody also recognizes CD52-like human epididymis glycoprotein and alter the lipid raft microdomain of the cell membrane; thus initiating immobilization of the sperm head causing sperm capacitation17,18 the terminal step during maturation of mammalian spermatozoa. In transplant, continuous high doses of alemtuzumab treatment is because drastic lymphocytopenia that causes generalized immunosuppression and invites oppor tunistic infection.19 Thus, alemtuzumab dosage, duration of treatment, and combination strategy with other immunomodifiers are critical for successful transplant therapy.

Pharmacological aspects of alemtuzumab: dosages, routes, and duration of treatment
Recent advancements in allograft and/or transplant procedures have demonstrated the efficacy of low doses of alemtuzumab in delaying graft rejection. The Table 1 provides a summary of recent experimental and clinical trials on transplant involving the use of alemtuzumab. The treatment using combination of alemtuzumab with immunosuppressant along with stem cells is a promising therapeutic strategy. However, prevention of opportunistic infections with proper choice of antibiotics is an issue to be resolved in treatment procedure. A 2014 update indicated therapeutic use of alemtuzumab in transplant and a way to find remedies for opportunistic infections.20 To prevent allergic manifestation and infusion reactions such as pyrexia, chills, hypotension, urticaria, and dyspnea during beginning stage of treatment, it is recommended to use slow intravenous infusion of alemtuzumab over a period of 2 hours or subcutaneous routes with dosages in escalating 3 mg, 10 mg and 30 mg, or 30 mg per kg body weight for 3 days a week.21 The mean volume of distribution after intravenous infusion is 0.18 L/kg. The mean half-life is 11 hours after the first 30 mg infusion of the drug.

Alemtuzumab as immunomodifier in transplant therapy
The selective use of immunosuppressing compounds has gained a degree of importance in transplant therapy. The meta-analysis data suggest use of alemtuzumab as immunomodifier in transplant.22 Recently, Zhang and associates23 showed that peripheral blood of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients demonstrated significant decrease of circulatory CD4 and CD8 cells at day 7 after alemtuzumab treatment. The status of such condition persists until 12 months after treatment initiation. However, a remarkable alteration in T cell repertoire after alemtuzumab treatment of RRMS patients showed an increase in CD4CD25CD127low Treg cell population in peripheral blood after a month of treatment, but not after 7 days, when nearly all CD4 and CD8 cells were found depleted from blood. The observations indicate an enlightened future of alemtuzumab in treatment of RRMS. Not only that, immuno modifier effect of the monoclonal antibody can effectively be implemented in transplant maintaining peripheral tolerance. A few relevant investigations suggest that depletion of alloimmune responsive CD4, CD8 cells along with up-regulation of peripheral tolerance through generation of Treg cells is a therapeutic approach for treatment of RRMS and organ transplant.24-26 The mean time of reconstitution of CD19, CD8, and CD4 was found 6, 10, and 36 months after alemtuzumab treatment.24 Different investigators also suggest a combination of alemtuzumab and T cell depleting antibody (antithymocyte globulin) as a low-risk steroid-free treatment strategy for kidney transplant.27,29

Modern research on transplant therapy approach using alemtuzumab demonstrate lower acute rejection rates in combination with the immuno suppressive drug, calcineurin inhibitor, tacrolimus (Fujimycin, FK-506).34 The macrolide lactone tacrolimus reduces activation of NF AT in T cells thus attenuates IL2 gene expression. The benefit of combination therapy using tacrolimus with alemtuzumab remains in the function of alemtuzumab to deplete mature and functional lymphocytes while tacrolimus attenuates activation of mature T lymphocytes in circulation. Recently, different investigators reported efficacy of alemtuzumab treatment in expansion of transitional B cells and regulatory B cells during kidney transplants.35,36 The proper mechanism of such repopulation of Breg and Treg cells after depletion of alloreactive cells is not clear and subject to in depth research. In particular, antigen specificity of such phenomena and regulation of memory cells is an important aspect in transplant procedures. The observations indicate a possibility of maturation and proliferation of lymphoid progenitor cells as part of reconstitution process in long run after alemtuzumab treatment. Likewise, more research must determine the effect of alemtuzumab on CD52 bearing dendritic cells and macrophages in the aspect of depletion and reconstitution in peripheral blood during transplant. The specific interaction between alemtuzumab and immunocompetent hosts is still under a careful analysis to improve graft acceptance with less adverse effects. The recent results on alemtuzumab mode of action on T cell repertoire, B cells, macrophages, and complement cascades are shown in the Table 2.

Limitations of alemtuzumab treatment in transplant: clinicians’ perspectives
The selection of the proper dosage and duration of treatment are critical parameters in designing alemtuzumab-mediated therapeutic interventions for transplant and management of GVHD.37-39 Along with, the prevention of opportunistic infections is critical during posttransplant period.40,41 The preferred drug-induced immunocompromised conditions during transplant, thus, seek a continuous antimicrobial treatment regimen. The recent advancements in bone marrow and organ transplant put emphasis on use of vaccination and prophylaxis before set-up procedures.42

Conclusion and future perspectives
The lymphocyte depleting property of alemtuzumab leads the drug to induce a favorable condition for delaying rejection of allograft. In that aspect, the drug shows a promise for future treatment during transplant. The combination of antimicrobial treatment with alemtuzumab along with nonsteroidal compounds is a better approach for improvement of transplant therapy. Though, the treatment schedule is a matter of further research in transplant.


References:

  1. Ravandi F, O'Brien S.Alemtuzumab. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2005;5(1):39-51
    CrossRef - PubMed
  2. Isaacs JD, Wing MG, Greenwood JD, Hazleman BL, Hale G, Waldmann H.A therapeutic human IgG4 monoclonal antibody that depletes target cells in humans. Clin Exp Immunol. 1996;106(3):427-433.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  3. Rao SP, Sancho J, Campos-Rivera J, et al. Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells exhibit heterogeneous CD52 expression levels and show differential sensitivity to alemtuzumab mediated cytolysis. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e39416.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  4. Hale C, Bartholomew M, Taylor V, Stables J, Topley P, Tite J. Recognition of CD52 allelic gene products by CAMPATH-1H antibodies. Immunology. 1996;88(2):183-190.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  5. Klabusay M, Sukova V, Coupek P, Brychtova Y, Mayer J. Different levels of CD52 antigen expression evaluated by quantitative fluorescence cytometry are detected on B-lymphocytes, CD 34+ cells and tumor cells of patients with chronic B-cell lymphoproliferative diseases. Cytometry B Clin Cytom. 2007;72(5):363-370.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  6. Golay J, Lazzari M, Facchinetti V, et al. CD20 levels determine the in vitro susceptibility to rituximab and complement of B-cell chronic lymphocytic leukemia: further regulation by CD55 and CD59. Blood. 2001;98(12):3383-3389.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  7. Rowan W, Tite J, Topley P, Brett SJ. Cross-linking of the CAMPATH-1 antigen (CD52) mediates growth inhibition in human B- and T-lymphoma cell lines, and subsequent emergence of CD52-deficient cells. Immunology. 1998;95(3):427-436.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  8. Nguyen TH, Havari E, McLaren R, et al. Alemtuzumab induction of intracellular signaling and apoptosis in malignant B lymphocytes. Leuk Lymphoma. 2012;53(4):699-709.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  9. Nückel H, Frey UH, Röth A, Dührsen U, Siffert W. Alemtuzumab induces enhanced apoptosis in vitro in B-cells from patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia by antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity. Eur J Pharmacol. 2005;514(2-3):217-224.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  10. Stanglmaier M, Reis S, Hallek M. Rituximab and alemtuzumab induce a nonclassic, caspase-independent apoptotic pathway in B-lymphoid cell lines and in chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells. Ann Hematol. 2004;83(10):634-645.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  11. Albitar M, Do KA, Johnson MM, et al. Free circulating soluble CD52 as a tumor marker in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and its implication in therapy with anti-CD52 antibodies. Cancer. 2004;101(5):999-1008.
    PubMed http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15329909
  12. Buggins AG, Mufti GJ, Salisbury J, et al. Peripheral blood but not tissue dendritic cells express CD52 and are depleted by treatment with alemtuzumab. Blood. 2002;100(5):1715-1720.
    PubMed
  13. Greenwood J, Gorman SD, Routledge EG, Lloyd IS, Waldmann H. Engineering multiple-domain forms of the therapeutic antibody CAMPATH-1H: effects on complement lysis. Ther Immunol. 1994;1(5):247-255.
    PubMed
  14. Nicholson-Weller A, Wang CE. Structure and function of decay accelerating factor CD55. J Lab Clin Med. 1994;123(4):485-491.
    PubMed
  15. Cai B, Xie S, Liu F, et al. Rapid degradation of the complement regulator, CD59, by a novel inhibitor. J Biol Chem. 2014;289(17):12109-12125.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  16. Flori F, Giovampaola CD, Focarelli R, et al. Epitope analysis of immunoglobulins against gp20, a GPI-anchored protein of the human sperm surface homologous to leukocyte antigen CD52. Tissue Antigens. 2005;66(3):209-216.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  17. Ermini L, Secciani F, La Sala GB, et al. Different glycoforms of the human GPI-anchored antigen CD52 associate differently with lipid microdomains in leukocytes and sperm membranes. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2005;338(2):1275-1283.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  18. Mould DR, Baumann A, Kuhlmann J, et al. Population pharmacokinetics-pharmacodynamics of alemtuzumab (Campath) in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and its link to treatment response. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2007;64(3):278-291.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  19. Hesselink DA, Weimar W. Renal transplantation in 2014: renal transplantation-reducing risk and improving outcome. Nat Rev Nephrol. 2015;11(2):72-73.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  20. Lin Y, Lin S, Watson M, et al. A gene expression signature that predicts the therapeutic response of the basal-like breast cancer to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2010;123(3):691-699.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  21. Morgan RD, O'Callaghan JM, Knight SR, Morris PJ. Alemtuzumab induction therapy in kidney transplantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transplantation. 2012;93(12):1179-1188.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  22. Zhang X, Tao Y, Chopra M, Ahn M, Marcus KL, Choudhary N, Zhu H, Markovic-Plese S. Differential reconstitution of T cell subsets following immunodepleting treatment with alemtuzumab (anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. J Immunol. 2013;191(12):5867-5874.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  23. Cossburn MD, Harding K, Ingram G, et al. Clinical relevance of differential lymphocyte recovery after alemtuzumab therapy for multiple sclerosis. Neurology. 2013;80(1):55-61.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  24. Macedo C, Walters JT, Orkis EA. Long-term effects of alemtuzumab on regulatory and memory T-cell subsets in kidney transplantation. Transplantation. 2012;93(8):813-821.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  25. Krystufkova E, Sekerkova A, Striz I, Brabcova I, Girmanova E, Viklicky O. Regulatory T cells in kidney transplant recipients: the effect of induction immunosuppression therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(6):2576-2582.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  26. Farney A, Sundberg A, Moore P, et al. A randomized trial of alemtuzumab vs. anti-thymocyte globulin induction in renal and pancreas transplantation. Clin Transplant. 2008;22(1):41-49.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  27. Reddy KS, Devarapalli Y, Mazur M, et al. Alemtuzumab with rapid steroid taper in simultaneous kidney and pancreas transplantation: comparison to induction with antithymocyte globulin. Transplant Proc. 2010;42(6):2006-2008.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  28. Parikh AR, Olnes MJ, Barrett AJ. Immunomodulatory treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes: antithymocyte globulin, cyclosporine, and alemtuzumab. Semin Hematol. 2012;49(4):304-311.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  29. Chan K, Taube D, Roufosse C, et al. Kidney transplantation with minimized maintenance: alemtuzumab induction with tacrolimus monotherapy--an open label, randomized trial. Transplantation. 2011;92(7):774-780.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  30. Shapiro R, Zeevi A, Basu A, et al. Alemtuzumab preconditioning with tacrolimus monotherapy-the impact of serial monitoring for donor-specific antibody. Transplantation. 2008;85(8):1125-1132.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  31. Nainani N, Patel N, Tahir N, et al. Effect of steroid-free low concentration calcineurin inhibitor maintenance immunosuppression regimen on renal allograft histopathology and function. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2012;27(5):2077-2083.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  32. Chang GJ, Mahanty HD, Vincenti F, et al. A calcineurin inhibitor-sparing regimen with sirolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and anti-CD25 mAb provides effective immunosuppression in kidney transplant recipients with delayed or impaired graft function. Clin Transplant. 2000;14(6):550-554.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  33. Margreiter R, Klempnauer J, Neuhaus P, Muehlbacher F, Boesmueller C, Calne RY. Alemtuzumab (Campath-1H) and tacrolimus monotherapy after renal transplantation: results of a prospective randomized trial. Am J Transplant. 2008;8(7):1480-1485.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  34. Heidt S, Hester J, Shankar S, Friend PJ, Wood KJ. B cell repopulation after alemtuzumab induction-transient increase in transitional B cells and long-term dominance of naïve B cells. Am J Transplant. 2012;12(7):1784-1792.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  35. Todeschini M, Cortinovis M, Perico N, et al. In kidney transplant patients, alemtuzumab but not basiliximab/low-dose rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induces B cell depletion and regeneration, which associates with a high incidence of de novo donor-specific anti-HLA antibody development. J Immunol. 2013;191(5):2818-2828.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  36. Busemann C, Neumann T, Schulze M, et al.Low-dose alemtuzumab vs. standard policy for prevention of graft-versus-host disease in unrelated and related allogeneic stem cell transplantation-a matched pair analysis. Ann Hematol. 2013;92(7):945-952.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  37. Novitzky N, Thomas V, du Toit C. Prevention of graft vs. host disease with alemtuzumab 'in the bag' decreases early toxicity of stem cell transplantation and in multiple myeloma is associated with improved long-term outcome. Cytotherapy. 2008;10(1):45-53.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  38. Kottaridis PD, Milligan DW, Chopra R, et al. In vivo CAMPATH-1H prevents GvHD following nonmyeloablative stem-cell transplantation. Cytotherapy. 2001;3(3):197-201.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  39. Requião-Moura LR, deMatos AC, Pacheco-Silva A. Cytomegalovirus infection in renal transplantation: clinical aspects, management and the perspectives. Einstein (Sao Paulo). 2015;13(1):142-148.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  40. Vidal E, Cervera C, Cordero E; and the Study Group of Infection in Transplant Recipients (GESITRA) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases, Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC); and the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI). Management of urinary tract infection in solid organ transplant recipients: Consensus statement of the Group for the Study of Infection in Transplant Recipients (GESITRA) of the Spanish Society of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology (SEIMC) and the Spanish Network for Research in Infectious Diseases (REIPI). Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2015. pii: S0213-005X(15)00147-0.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  41. Torre-Cisneros J, Fortún J, Aguado JM, et al. Consensus document from GESITRA-SEIMC on the prevention and treatment of cytomegalovirus infection in transplanted patients[in Spanish]. Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 2005;23(7):424-437.
    CrossRef - PubMed
  42. Ando T,Kojima K, Isoda H, et al. Reactivation of resolved infection with the hepatitis B virus immune escape mutant G145R during dasatinib treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia. Int J Hematol. 2015;102(3):379-382.
    CrossRef - PubMed


Volume : 14
Issue : 1
Pages : 17 - 21
DOI : 10.6002/ect.2015.0254


PDF VIEW [391] KB.

From the Departments of 1Pathology, 2Clinical Correlation in Basic Sciences, 3Microbiology, Immunology, 4Biochemistry, Saint James School of Medicine, Albert Lake Drive, A-I-2640, The Quarter, P.O Box 318, Anguilla, British West Indies
Acknowledgements: We acknowledge resources of Saint James School of Medicine. We are thankful to Dr. Claude-Iliou (Anguilla Campus, Pharmacology) for his support in academics and medical research in Saint James School of Medicine. One of the authors (F A A) is a senior medical student of school. A R, F A A, and a junior fellow (MghB) prepared the draft of this manuscript. P E is a clinician; she provided valuable critics on the drug and ongoing clinical trials and took effort to edit language of the manuscript. We do not have any conflicts of interests.
Corresponding author: Subhajit Dasgupta, PhD, Professor Microbiology, Immunology, Saint James School of Medicine, Albert Lake Drive, A-I-2640, The Quarter, P.O Box 318’ Anguilla, British West Indies
Phone: +1 264 497 5125 (Reception); +1 264 772 2443
E-mail: sdasgupta@mail.sjsm.org subhajitdasgupta@outlook.com