Objectives: In this study, we revisited the reasons for poorer prognosis after liver transplant in patients with hepatitis C virus, whose main causes of death were generally known to be recurrent disease.
Materials and Methods: Between April 2003 and March 2017, among 132 patients who underwent liver transplant because of liver cirrhosis at our institution, 40 patients (30.3%) were positive for hepatis C virus. We retrospectively compared the overall survival after liver transplant in patients with and without hepatitis C virus infection. Furthermore, we investigated the causes of death in transplant recipients with hepatitis C virus infections.
Results: In patients with hepatitis C virus infection, overall survival was 82.2%, 75.2%, and 50.8% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively, after liver transplant; these results were lower than those in patients without infection (94.5%, 87.0%, and 87.0% at 1, 5, and 10 years, respectively; P = .001). Among 40 patients with positive infection, 14 patients died after liver transplant. A main reason for death was hepatocellular carcinoma recurrence (3 patients). Surprisingly, only 1 patient died from hepatitis C virus-related complication (fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis); the remaining 10 patients died from reasons other than hepatitis C virus disease progression.
Conclusions: Our results suggest that clinicians should not only be aware of hepatitis C virus recurrence but should also be aware of other unrelated complications in transplant recipients who are positive for this
Key words : Liver cirrhosis, Recurrent hepatitis, Survival
Hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence after liver transplant is a universally understood complication. Once the new graft is reinfected with HCV, a rapid increase of virus is induced, resulting in a high proportion of patients developing recurrent hepatitis, with 20% to 40% of patients progressing to liver cirrhosis in 5 years1-4 and half of patients subsequently showing decompensation after several years.3-5 Thus, treatment for posttransplant HCV recurrence is a major issue for improving posttransplant survival.
Many reports have supported the concept that progression of HCV recurrence is the main reason for the poor prognosis after liver transplant in HCV-positive patients.1,3-5 This has resulted in most transplant centers providing concerted efforts for HCV eradication after liver transplant. Similar to that shown in nontransplant patients, a sustained virological response (SVR) induces significantly better survival in HCV-positive transplant patients.6-9 During the interferon (IFN) era, however, transplant patients were difficult to treat, and the SVR rate was not satisfactory.9-11 After the introduction of the combinations of an IFN-free, direct-acting antiviral (DAA) regimen, the SVR rate dramatically improved,12,13 and better prognosis could be expected even in transplant recipients with HCV.
Several reports have shown that HCV infection can lead to various extrahepatic manifestations, such as cryoglobulinemia,14 renal dysfunction,15 insulin resistance,16 cardiovascular diseases,17,18 neurological disorders,19 and so on.20 Recent reports have shown that not only liver-related but also non-liver-related mortality rates are significantly higher in HCV-positive patients according to the Fibrosis-4 index.21 Therefore, transplant centers should perhaps focus on complications other than progression of HCV recurrence in transplant recipients, especially in the recent era of combination treatment with highly effective DAAs.
In this study, we revisited survival after liver transplant in patients with HCV infection. We also focused on causes of death in these patients to investigate reasons for death other than progression of recurrent disease.
Materials and Methods
Between April 2003 and March 2017, we performed liver transplant procedures for 132 adult patients (≥18 years) with end-stage chronic liver disease. Mean age of the recipients was 49.8 ± 11.0 years and that of donors was 38.0 ± 13.1 years. Forty-nine patients had hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC); 111 patients received living donor liver transplant, and 21 patients received deceased donor liver transplant. For living donor liver transplant procedures, all donors were related, including 54 from children, 39 from spouses, 10 from parents, 7 from siblings, and 1 from an uncle. Among them, 40 patients were HCV positive. Table 1 shows the background data of patients with and without HCV.
This study conformed to the ethical guidelines of the 1975 Declaration of Helsinki and was approved by the ethical committee of Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine (No. 2015-0318).
Perioperative management in transplant patients with HCV infection
Before transplant, we did not generally treat HCV-positive patients because most patients were transplanted in the IFN-era and were difficult to treat due to poor liver functional reserve; all HCV-positive patients underwent liver transplant with viremia.
Patients received the immunosuppression protocol with a steroid bolus immediately after reperfusion of the graft; afterward, prednisolone and calcineurin inhibitors (29 with tacrolimus and 11 with cyclosporin A) were introduced. In some patients, especially those with pretransplant renal dysfunction, mycophenolate mofetil was also introduced to reduce the dose of calcineurin inhibitors. The dose of steroid was gradually tapered; however, we generally continued a low maintenance dose of prednisolone at 5 mg/day from postoperative month 3 to postoperative year 2 and then at 2.5 mg/day for the next 3 years or until the patients achieved SVR by anti-HCV treatment. Protocol biopsy was performed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months and then subsequently every 6 months; if patients showed recurrence of HCV infection, anti-HCV treatment was introduced for applicable patients.
Comparison of survival and causes of death between patients with and without hepatitis C virus infection
We compared survival outcomes of 40 HCV-positive patients versus 92 HCV-negative patients after liver transplant. Survival of overall patients and those with and without HCV infection were also analyzed according to existence of pretransplant HCC. Survival was also compared between HCV-positive and HCV-negative patients without HCC. Causes of death in HCV-positive and HCV-negative patients were also examined.
The Kaplan-Meier method was used to investigate survival after liver transplant, and the log-rank test was used to compare survival among each subgroup of patients. To compare differences between HCV-positive and HCV-negative patients, propensity score matching was performed, with survival compared between 40 HCV-positive and 31 matched HCV-negative patients. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS version 24.0 (IBM Corporation).
Overall survival of liver transplant recipients with end-stage liver disease and survival comparison according to etiology
In the 132 patients with end-stage chronic liver disease who received liver transplant procedures between April 2003 and March 2017, overall survival was 90.8% at 1 year, 84.7% at 5 years, and 76.1% at 10 years posttransplant (Figure 1).
Figure 2 shows survival according to disease before transplant, with survival varying significantly according to reason for transplant (P = .017). We found that survival was significantly lower in HCV-positive patients compared with patients with hepatitis B virus (P = .037), primary biliary cholangitis (P = .026), and primary sclerosing cholangitis (P = .026).
Overall survival of patients with and without hepatitis C virus after liver transplant
As shown in Figure 3, overall survival of HCV-positive patients was 82.2% at 1 year, 75.2% at 5 years, and 50.8% at 10 years, respectively; in HCV-negative patients, overall survival was 94.5% at 1 year, 87.0% at 5 years, and 87.0% at 10 years, respectively, with statistically significant differences between groups (P = .001).
For background factors that were statistically significant between groups (HCC, recipient age, and calcineurin inhibitor; Table 1), we investigated propensity score matching between patients with and without HCV. Table 2 shows background results after propensity score matching. We found survival to be lower in the 40 patients positive for HCV compared with the 31 patients negative for HCV (Figure 3B; P = .024)
Overall survival in patients with and without hepatitis C virus according to hepatocellular carcinoma
Among 40 HCV-positive patients, 23 (57.5%) had HCC compared with 26 of 92 patients (28.3%) who were negative for HCV infection (Table 1; P = .001). Overall survival in patients with HCC was significantly lower than survival in patients without HCC (Figure 4A; P = .005). However, when we examined only HCV-positive patients, overall survival of patients with HCC was not significantly lower than overall survival of patients without HCC (Figure 4B; P = .722). This was in contrast to our findings in HCV-negative patients, where overall survival of patients with HCC was significantly lower than that shown in patients without HCC (Figure 3C; P = .004). When we focused on patients without HCC, overall survival of HCV-positive patients was significantly lower than that shown in HCV-negative patients (Figure 4D; P = .001).
Causes of death in patients with hepatitis C virus after liver transplant, with focus on causes other than progression of hepatitis C virus disease
Our investigation of causes of death during our study period in HCV-positive patients included 14 patients who died. Causes of death are shown in Table 3. Among them, 7 patients died in the early postoperative period (<12 mo posttransplant) and the remaining 7 patients died in the later period after transplant (that is, ≥12 mo posttransplant). Among these patients, only 1 (patient 7) had death related to HCV progression (fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis) at the early posttransplant period. For those patients who died ?12 months posttransplant, 3 patients died of HCC recurrence; causes of death for the remaining 4 patients were 2 from severe biliary stricture and 1 each from protein losing enteropathy and renal failure, which were considered as death unrelated to HCV disease progression.
In the early posttransplant period, HCV-positive patients tended to have lower survival compared with HCV-negative patients (P = .086, Figure 5A). In the later posttransplant period (≥1 year), HCV-positive patients showed significantly lower survival compared with HCV-negative patients (P = .006, Figure 5B).
In terms of HCV treatment, 32 patients received anti-HCV treatment, and 26 patients attained SVR (81.3%). Notably, all 16 patients who received an IFN-free, DAA combination treatment achieved SVR, and none of these patients died during the observation period. Among patients who died, 7 patients received antiviral treatment, with death occurring mostly in the late postoperative period and only 1 patient attaining SVR (Table 3). All of these patients received IFN-based treatment (that is, no patients received IFN-free, DAA combination treatment).
Causes of death in patients without hepatitis C virus after liver transplant
Among 92 HCV-negative patients, 11 patients died during the study period. Table 4 shows causes of death. Two patients each died from chronic rejection and HCC recurrence in the late posttransplant period (≥12 mo posttransplant); other causes of death in the early period posttransplant included splenic aneurysm rupture, abdominal hemorrhage, severe acute cellular rejection (ACR), acute respiratory distress syndrome, liver abscess, graft versus host disease, and graft failure.
Although survival of transplant patients with HCV was definitely lower compared with survival in patients with other etiologies, causes of death were not different between those with and without HCV, with HCV recurrence and progression of disease less than we expected in our cohort.
In the present study, we confirmed that survival rates after liver transplant were significantly lower in HCV-positive patients compared with HCV-negative patients. It is generally known that patients with HCV infection have a poor posttransplant prognosis. However, in our study cohort, mortality related to HCV recurrence was unexpectedly low and the dominant causes of death were unrelated to progression of liver disease due to HCV recurrence. With this finding, we focused on causes of death other than disease progression of HCV recurrence in our transplant patients.
One reason for the small number of HCV recurrence-related deaths in our cohort may have been because of the low-dose maintenance of steroids after liver transplant. Berenguer and colleagues reported that shorter duration of prednisolone was a significant factor affecting survival, and they hypothesized that avoiding rapid tapering of steroids improved the prognosis of such patients.22,23 Samonakis and colleagues also reported that maintenance steroids were associated with less fibrosis after liver transplant, and they discussed that rapid withdrawal of steroids may allow early reconstitution of the immune system, leading to severe immune-mediated liver damage and thus to more frequent and severe forms of HCV recurrence.24
In our cohort, despite the lower frequency of HCV recurrence-related deaths, we found that prognosis after liver transplant in HCV-positive patients was generally poor. There are several extrahepatic manifestations associated with HCV infection, such as cryoglobulinemia, renal involvement in the form of membranoproliferative glomerulonephritis, mesangial glomerulonephritis, and focal segmental glomerulonephritis, as well as metabolic manifestations (including diabetes and insulin resistance), cardiovascular diseases (including coronary, peripheral, and cerebrovascular diseases), and some types of peripheral neuropathies.20
In our cohort, causes of death in 4 patients were considered to be liver related due to the HCV infection, with 1 patient with fibrosing cholestatic hepatitis (patient 7; see Table 3) and 3 patients with HCC recurrence (patients 10, 11, 12; see Table 3). The remaining 10 patients died from factors unrelated to progression of HCV disease (Table 3). In the early postoperative period, the causes of death were rejection (1 each of acute and chronic rejection) in 2 patients, infection in 2 patients, and hemophagocytic syndrome and splenic aneurysm rupture in 1 patient each.
Some reports have shown higher incidence of ACR in HCV-positive posttransplant patients,25,26 although some reports have not supported this,27,28 with agreement remaining controversial.29,30 Furthermore, in our group, 1 HCV-negative patient (patient 17) died from severe ACR (Table 4). Another point that should be discussed with regard to rejection is the relationship with antiviral treatment for HCV. In our cohort, patient 4 died from chronic rejection during IFN plus ribavirin treatment. Chronic rejection is a relatively rare event after liver transplant, with only few reports describing a relationship between chronic rejection and IFN treatment; thus, this remains a topic of debate.31-33 Patients 22 and 23 (HCV-negative patients) also died from chronic rejection. In general, the correlation between rejection and HCV should be carefully interpreted.
In our cohort, 2 patients died from pneumonia and sepsis in the early postoperative period. Gayowski and colleagues showed that HCV was a risk factor for infectious morbidity after liver transplant. The investigators pointed out the immunomodulatory effect of HCV and that it may facilitate infections from pathogens associated with depressed cell-mediated immunity.34 Giannella and colleagues reported that HCV recurrence was an independent risk factor for carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae after liver transplant.35
In the late posttransplant period in our cohort, a main cause of death was HCC recurrence; in contrast, in the remaining patients, causes of death included protein-losing enteropathy, biliary stricture, and renal failure, which are not considered directly related to HCV recurrence.
Fujita and colleagues showed that late biliary anastomotic strictures were found in posttransplant patients with HCV and that early recurrence of HCV was one of the independent factors associated with late biliary anastomotic strictures.36 Renal dysfunction is another issue that can possibly affect prognosis after liver transplant. After transplant, although immunosuppression using a calcineurin inhibitor is the key to avoiding cellular rejection, administration of calcineurin inhibitors could itself precipitate the renal dysfunction after liver transplant in some patients.37 A recent report showed that HCV infection is a risk factor for posttransplant chronic renal failure, as well as age, male sex, and estimated glomerular filtration rate at discharge.38
In transplant patients, DAA combination therapy has resulted in a high rate of SVR, similar to that shown in nontransplant patients.12,13 Hence, there is an interesting clinical question regarding whether survival outcomes not related to liver disease will be reduced. Tada and colleagues reported that, among untreated HCV-positive patients, a Fibrosis-4 index score greater than 3.25 was an independent and predictive risk factor for both liver-related and non-liver-related death.21 The investigators also reported that SVR is associated with all-cause mortality in HCV-positive patients.39 In our cohort, only 7 of 14 patients who died could receive anti-HCV treatment. In addition, only 1 of the 7 treated patients attained SVR (by pegylated IFN + ribavirin treatment). One reason why few received treatment was death during the early postoperative period and because HCV treatment could not be introduced for those with HCV recurrence-unrelated comorbidities. In contrast, no patients in our cohort died after the start of the DAA era. Further studies are needed on whether DAA treatment could reduce not only HCV-related but also HCV-unrelated death in transplant patients.
A limitation of this study was that it was a single-center experience and retrospective study with a small number of patients. Despite our limited cohort, we concurred that HCV progression remains a main cause of death, as universally agreed. However, other causes of death that are not related to progression of HCV disease require more consideration. Along with further validation of our findings, we suggest that transplant patients should be carefully followed, especially those who have attained SVR in this IFN-free era to confirm the results of this study.
In our investigation of outcomes of HCV-positive patients who underwent liver transplant, HCV-positive patients definitely showed poorer prognosis after liver transplant compared with transplant recipients who were negative for HCV. However, most deaths were not related to liver disease in our cohort. Therefore, both progression of liver diseases and extrahepatic manifestations should be carefully monitored in HCV-positive transplant patients.
Volume : 19
Issue : 9
Pages : 935 - 942
DOI : 10.6002/ect.2021.0197
From the 1Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and the 2Department of Transplant Surgery, Nagoya University School of Medicine, Nagoya, Japan
Acknowledgements: The authors have not received any funding or grants in support of the presented research or for the preparation of this work and have no declarations of potential conflicts of interest.
Corresponding author: Masatoshi Ishigami, 65 Tsurumai-cho, Showa-ku, Nagoya 466-8550, Japan
Phone: +81 52 744 2190
Table 1. Preoperative Background Data of Patients With and Without Hepatitis C Virus
Figure 1. Posttransplant Survival of Patients With Chronic End-Stage Liver Disease in the Total Study Cohort
Figure 2. Posttransplant Survival of Patients With Chronic End-Stage Liver Diseases According to Reasons for Transplant
Figure 3. Survival of Patients With and Without Hepatitis C Virus
Table 2. Preoperative Background Data of Patients With and Without Hepatitis C Virus After Propensity Score Matching
Figure 4. Survival According to Presence of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Table 3. Causes of Death After Liver Transplant in Patients with Hepatitis C Virus Infection
Figure 5. Survival in Patients With and Without Hepatitis C Virus Infection After Liver Transplant
Table 4. Causes of Death After Liver Transplant in Patients Without Hepatitis C Virus Infection