Objectives: Thrombocytopenia is a common problem among liver transplant recipients. However, various patterns of change in platelet counts during adult liver transplant have been reported in the literature. This study aimed to evaluate alterations in platelet count according to the surgical phase (preanhepatic, anhepatic, after reperfusion) and during the early postoperative period of liver transplant.
Materials and Methods: Perioperative data from 100 patients undergoing deceased donor liver transplant were reviewed, including platelet count-related data. Platelet counts were measured at predefined time points throughout the procedure: immediately before induction of anesthesia, at the early neo-hepatic stage (10 min after graft reperfusion), immediately after admission to the intensive care unit posttransplant, and 6 hours posttransplant. Platelet counts were then measured daily during stay in the intensive care unit.
Results: Mean baseline platelet count before transplant and anesthesia was 97.92 × 109/L. A peak platelet count was seen in the early neo-hepatic stage. Platelet counts then decreased sharply in the first 6 hours after transplant. A slight decrease in platelet counts continued until the third day after the surgery; finally, on day 6 posttransplant, platelet counts increased significantly.
Conclusions: Our study showed a significant sudden increase in platelet counts during the early neo-hepatic phase in many liver transplant recipients. Therefore, our results suggest that it is reasonable to avoid platelet transfusion for most liver transplant recipients during transplant surgery.
Key words : End-stage liver disease, Homeostasis, Platelet transfusion, Thrombocytopenia
Platelets play a definite role in a process known as primary hemostasis, the first step of normal hemostasis.1 Moreover, numerous investigations have shown that platelets have roles in various nonhemostatic properties, such as inflammation,2 ischemia-reperfusion injury,3 antimicrobial defense,4 angiogenesis,5 tissue repair, and liver regeneration.6,7
The prevalence of thrombocytopenia in patients with liver cirrhosis is known to be as high as 70%.8 As mentioned, platelets have both beneficial and detrimental effects on liver grafts. In addition, the optimal management of thrombocytopenia among liver transplant recipients is still a matter of discussion. During liver transplant, a certain number of platelets are needed to maintain hemostasis; however, threshold values for platelet counts have not been defined.9 Moreover, hemostatic disorders during liver transplant are usually affected by the surgical stage, in particular, during reperfusion of the liver graft.10
Recently, balanced blood product transfusion with packed red blood cells (PRBCs), fresh frozen plasma (FFP), and platelets has been advocated as a resuscitation strategy during liver transplant.11,12 Assessing the pattern of changes in platelet counts during the procedure is necessary to determine the appropriate component ratios.
In this study, we evaluated changes in platelet counts during the perioperative period of adult liver transplant for optimal management of platelet transfusion in these surgeries.
Materials and Methods
Our retrospective study included 100 adult (age >18 years) patients who had undergone deceased donor liver transplant at the Organ Transplant Center of Mashhad University between July 2015 and October 2017. The study was approved by the University Ethics Committee (approval number: IR.MUMS.fm.REC.1396.184). The electronic medical record system of the center and patient charts were used for data collection.
Cases of acute liver failure, split-liver grafts, liver retransplant, and combined transplants were excluded from the study.
The classic technique without venovenous bypass or the piggyback technique was used for liver transplant. Donated liver grafts were prepared using University of Wisconsin solution. Before liver graft reperfusion, methylprednisolone (500 mg) was administered.
After initiation of standard monitoring (pulse oximetry, 5-lead electrocardiography, and noninvasive arterial blood pressure measurements), anesthesia was induced using propofol (1-2 mg/kg) and 0.2 mg/kg cisatracurium. Maintenance of anesthesia was achieved with the use of isoflurane in low to moderate concentrations (0.5-1.0 minimum alveolar concentration) and bolus cisatracurium. A remifentanil infusion (0.05-0.3 μg/kg/min) and bolus fentanyl were administered based on the patient’s hemodynamic responses. Mechanical ventilation was delivered at a tidal volume of 8 to 10 mL/kg using a mixture of medical air and oxygen at a fresh gas flow rate of 2 L/min, and the respiratory rate was adjusted as needed to maintain normocapnia. After induction of anesthesia, a central venous pressure catheter and a radial arterial line were placed to allow continuous hemodynamic monitoring and blood sampling.
The intravenous fluid included 1% to 2% albumin in normal saline, and the rate of infusion was regulated according to central venous pressure, urine output, and volume of blood loss. The use of inotropes and vasopressors were at the discretion of the anesthesiologist and in response to the patient’s hemodynamic status. Transfusion of PRBCs was used to target hematocrit level of 25% to 30%. Coagulation components were replaced under thromboelastographic guidance to correct intraoperative coagulopathies. Clinical coagulopathy with platelet count of less than 20 × 109/L was used as a threshold to initiate platelet transfusion postoperatively.
Blood samples were obtained from the arterial line, and platelet counts were determined by using the automated method (BC-5800 Mindray auto hematology analyzer). Platelet counts were measured at 2 predefined time points during the procedure: immediately before induction of anesthesia and at the early neo-hepatic stage (10 min after graft reperfusion). Platelet counts were also measured posttransplant: immediately after admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and 6 hours later. Platelet counts were then measured daily during the ICU stay.
Donor characteristics considered for analyses included age (years), sex, cause of brain death, history of cardiac arrest, and number of days in the ICU. Recipient characteristics considered for analyses included age (years), sex, body mass index, underlying liver disease, size of spleen, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease score, pretransplant platelet count, pretransplant hemoglobin and international normalized ratio (INR), and presence of portal vein thrombosis before liver transplant. Intraoperative data collected for analyses included blood loss (m3), intraoperative platelet count, INR value, intraoperative transfusions units (PRBC, FFP, cryoprecipitate, platelets), cold and warm ischemia time, and duration of surgery. Postoperative data collected for analyses included platelet count, INR value, postoperative transfusions in ICU (PRBC, FFP, cryoprecipitate, platelets), and number of days in the ICU.
Categorical data were expressed as numbers and percentages and continuous variables as means and standard deviations. Continuous variables (perioperative changes of platelet count) were compared with repeated-measure analysis of variance or Friedman test, and categorical variables were compared by the chi-square test. Pearson correlation was used to assess the linear relationships between pairs of continuous variables. P < .05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed with the use of SPSS version 16 (SPSS: An IBM Company) and R software.
In this retrospective observational study, 100 patients who underwent deceased donor liver transplant were included. Mean age of patients was 43 years, and men were predominant by 73%. In donors, head trauma was the most common cause of brain death (57%). The demographic data of patients and the perioperative data are shown in Table 1.
The mean platelet count before liver transplant was 97.920 × 109/L. The peak platelet count was seen during the early neo-hepatic stage, with a mean platelet count of 115.280 × 109/L. Platelet counts then decreased sharply in the first 6 hours posttransplant. A slight decrease in platelet count continued until day 3 after transplant, and platelet count then returned to preoperative levels approximately on day 6 after transplant, with mean platelet count of 87.810 × 109/L. Figure 1a shows perioperative changes in mean platelet counts.
It should be emphasized that, during the operation, 88% of liver transplant recipients did not receive platelet transfusion, and, in the postoperative period, 80% of these patients did not require platelet administration. In addition, the percentage of patients who did not receive tranexamic acid and fibrinogen concentrate during surgery was 98% and 89%, respectively. Figure 1b shows changes in platelet counts in liver transplant recipients who did not receive platelet transfusion intraoperatively. A review of platelet count, INR, and hemoglobin values in liver transplant recipients during the perioperative period showed significant changes (P < .001) (Figure 2).
The relationship between the main parameters, which included platelet counts and hemoglobin and INR values in the perioperative period, showed that platelet and hemoglobin levels had significant correlations between measurements during this time (repeated r = 0.28; P < .001). However, there was no significant correlation between platelet and INR levels in measurements over the same period (repeated r = 0.06; P = .8).
In this study, we noticed an abrupt increase in platelet levels during the early period after reperfusion in most liver transplant recipients. However, this result contrasts with what is stated in the literature.
As reported by Droc and associates,13 after liver graft reperfusion, platelet count decreased by 30% to 55% because of entrapment of platelets in the liver. The finding has also been reported in another article9 based on previous studies by Himmelreich and colleagues.14,15 The investigation included 10 patients who underwent liver transplant with routine use of venovenous bypass surgical techniques; to compensate for blood loss during the surgery, only PRBC and FFP were used. In addition, a continuous infusion of aprotinin (Trasylol; Bayer Leverkusen, Leverkusen, Germany) was administered throughout the transplant procedure.
Over the past 3 decades, median blood loss associated with liver transplant has fallen dramatically, owing to improvements in surgical and anesthetic techniques as well as organ preservation and a better knowledge of the hemostatic disorders associated with liver transplant.16 Interestingly, after 2012, there was a significant decrease in the use of homologous blood, FFP, and platelets, whereas the use of fibrinogen increased.17 Therefore, some articles that have been published on this topic may need to be reviewed.
Based on observations, it is currently recommended to avoid platelet transfusions in liver transplant recipients, especially after reperfusion of the graft.16 Although in agreement with this opinion, our study showed that, in most liver transplant recipients, platelet transfusion was not necessary. Indeed, minimizing intraoperative liver transplant blood loss potentially contributed to maintaining posttransplant platelet levels.
Kim and associates reported that hyperfibrinolysis was remarkable during the late anhepatic and early postreperfusion phases of liver transplant.18 Hyperfibrinolysis spontaneously resolved within 1 hour after reperfusion of the graft and did not occur again. Interestingly, at the peak time of tissue plasminogen activator, the most important endogenous activator of plasminogen, elevation corresponded closely to the times of the sudden rise of platelet levels in our study. The interpretation of this issue requires further study.
The main limitation of our study is the absence of laboratory tests regarding fibrinolysis (tissue plasminogen activator, plasmin, plasminogen, etc).
In most of our recipients, the sudden increase in platelet counts occurred in the early postreperfusion phase of liver transplant and spontaneously resolved within 6 hours after transplant. Therefore, thrombocytopenia, which is detected in coagulation tests, should correspond with clinical findings and be used as a guide for platelet transfusions.
Volume : 19
Issue : 2
Pages : 137 - 141
DOI : 10.6002/ect.2020.0195
From the 1Surgical Oncology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical
Sciences, the 2Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine,
Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, the 3Clinical Research Unit, Faculty of
Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, and the 4Cardiac Anesthesia
Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Mashhad, Iran
Acknowledgements: We thank Elnaz Oskoian at the organ transplant center of Mashhad University of Medical Sciences for her assistance in data collection. The authors have no sources of funding for this study and have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Authorship contributions are listed. SM, AS: conception and design; AS, MJF: data collection; NM: statistical analyses; SM, AS, NM: data interpretation; SM: drafting of the article; AS, NZ: critical revision of the article for important intellectual content; SM, AS, NM, NZ, MJF: final manuscript approval.
Corresponding author: Soheila Milani, Surgical Oncology Research Center, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences, Imam Reza Hospital, Building No. 2, Department of General Surgery, 9133913716 Mashhad, Iran
Phone: +98 51 31802557
E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org and email@example.com
Figure 1. Overall Perioperative Trend of Platelet Counts During Liver Transplant (a) and Changes in Platelet Counts in Recipients Who Did Not Receive Platelet Transfusion Intraoperatively (b)
Figure 2. Perioperative Trends in Platelet Count, International Normalized Ratio, and Hemoglobin Levels During Liver Transplant
Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of Patients and Values of Perioperative Variables