Begin typing your search above and press return to search.
Volume: 19 Issue: 5 May 2021

FULL TEXT

ARTICLE
Safety and Efficacy of Long-Term Administration of Dipeptidyl peptidase IV Inhibitors in Patients With New Onset Diabetes After Kidney Transplant

Abstract

Objectives: The appearance of new onset diabetes is common after kidney transplant. Treatment options are limited because of renal function-related contraindications, interactions with immunosup­pressive drugs, and side effects. We investigated the long-term safety and efficacy of dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors in renal transplant recipients with new onset diabetes.
Materials and Methods: We treated 12 patients with dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors, and 5 patients received insulin monotherapy as initial treatment of new onset diabetes after kidney transplant. All patients were followed for 12 months after diagnosis. Glycosylated hemoglobin A1c, estimated glomerular filtration rate (Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration equation), plasma immunosuppressive trough levels, serum lipids, blood pressure, and body weight were measured during outpatient visits. Effects of dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors and insulin on the aforementioned parameters were measured to compare values at time of diagnosis versus mean values of the last 6 months of follow-up.
Results: Patients were treated with linagliptin (4 patients), sitagliptin (4 patients), vildagliptin (2 patients), and alogliptin (2 patients). Patients had a mean age of 59.4 ± 12 years and a mean glycosylated hemoglobin A1c of 6.6% at diagnosis, which was decreased to 6.1% (P = .03) at 1 year of follow-up. Renal function remained stable, and plasma tacrolimus levels did not appear to be affected. No significant differences were shown in serum total, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels after treatment. Nevertheless, triglyceride levels were significantly reduced (from 214.4 to 174.9 mg/dL; P = .0039). A decrease in body weight was also observed. Finally, patients treated with dipeptidyl peptidase V inhibitors achieved better glycosylated hemoglobin A1c levels than those treated with insulin.
Conclusions: Dipeptidyl peptidase IV inhibitors appear to be a safe, effective, and hypoglycemia-free option for treatment of new onset diabetes in renal transplant recipients and possibly provide better diabetes control than insulin therapy.


Key words : Linagliptin, Sitagliptin, Tacrolimus

Introduction

Kidney transplant has become the treatment of choice for end-stage renal disease.1 With modern advances in surgical techniques and immunosup­pression, life expectancy after kidney transplant has increased, whereas control of consequent chronic metabolic complications, such as dyslipidemia or diabetes mellitus, has emerged as an important medical issue.1,2 Especially, new onset diabetes after transplant (NODAT) is a serious and common complication in solid-organ transplantation. Prevalence of NODAT in kidney transplant recipients ranges from 4% to 25%, with NODAT associated with inferior outcomes, including lower rates of graft survival (graft rejection and loss), higher incidence of infections, and higher risk of cardiovascular disease.3,4

Multiple risk factors are associated with the development of NODAT and are classified into 3 categories: (1) nonmodifiable risk factors such as age >40 years,5 family history of diabetes,6 male recipient, male donor, deceased donor, polycystic kidney disease,7 HLA antigen mismatches; HLA antigen A30, B27, and B42; and ethnicity (African American, Hispanic)8; (2) modifiable risk factors such as immunosuppressive therapy (mainly corticosteroids and tacrolimus but also everolimus, sirolimus, and cyclosporine),9,10 obesity, or other components of the metabolic syndrome11; and (3) potentially modifiable risk factors such as infection (cytomegalovirus and hepatitis C),12,13 pretransplant impaired fasting glucose or impaired glucose tolerance, and hypomagnesemia.

Diagnostic criteria of NODAT are identical to the criteria for diabetes mellitus, as follows: (1) symptoms of diabetes and random plasma glucose greater than or equal to 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L), or (2) fasting plasma glucose greater than or equal to 126 mg/dL (7.0 mmol/L) on 2 separate days, or (3) 2-hour plasma glucose greater than or equal to 200 mg/dL (11.1 mmol/L) during an oral glucose tolerance test,14 which is the gold standard for NODAT diagnosis, especially in the early stages of transplant. The diagnosis of NODAT based on hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels is not accurate in the first 3 months after transplant because red blood cell survival is reduced.15 Beyond 3 months, the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes recommend a HbA1c target of less than 7% in most patients to reduce the incidence of microvascular disease.16

Current therapeutic strategies against NODAT are based on treatment guidelines for type 2 diabetes. Although type 2 diabetes is considered a problem of increased insulin resistance, recent data have demonstrated that impaired insulin secretion rather than impaired insulin sensitivity may be the principal pathophysiological defect in kidney transplant recipients.17,18 Thus, antidiabetic drugs that protect or improve pancreatic beta cell function may be optimal in NODAT treatment.19 Although metformin remains the initial choice in the treatment of type 2 diabetes because of its potential pleiotropic effects and safety profile, its use in patients with impaired renal function is prohibited because of the increased risk of lactic acidosis.20 Thiazolidinediones could be an interesting alternative, but these have side effects such as weight gain, increased risk for congestive heart failure, and osteoporosis.21 Sulfonylureas, despite the ability to enhance insulin secretion, do not prevent or delay the loss of islet cells and increase the rate of hypoglycemia.22

Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i) are selective inhibitors of DPP4, which is an enzyme that regulates degradation of the 2 major incretins, glucagon-like peptide 1 and glucose inhibitory pepti­de. Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors are effective antidiabetic drugs, without the risk of weight gain or hypoglycemia.23 Increasing evidence has demonstra­ted that DPP4i exert potential pleiotropic effects including anti-inflammatory, antihypertensive, antiapoptotic, and immunomodulatory effects on the heart, vessels, and kidney, independent of the hypoglycemic effects.24 Five DPP4i have been approved for clinical use, ie, sitagliptin, vildagliptin, saxagliptin, linagliptin, and alogliptin.

The primary aim of this study was to investigate the safety and efficacy of DDP4i monotherapy in patients with NODAT after kidney transplant, and the secondary aim was to compare their effectiveness versus standard insulin treatment.

Materials and Methods

Patients

In this retrospective study, we included 12 patients treated with DPP4i and 5 patients who received insulin therapy as initial treatment after diagnosis with NODAT from a pool of 187 patients with kidney transplant who were being followed in our outpatient clinic. Inclusion criteria were age >18 years, a history of kidney transplant, diagnosis of NODAT according to the standard criteria as mentioned previously, and no history of previous antidiabetic treatment. Exclusion criteria were diagnosis of diabetes before transplant and loss of follow-up within 12 months after initiation of treatment. The criteria for initiation of either an insulin-based regimen or DPP4i were completely based on the available treatment options and the physician’s preference at the time of initiation, ie, patients who received a kidney transplant during the recent decade and developed NODAT were treated with DPP4i, whereas recipients of earlier transplanted kidneys were treated with insulin. None of the patients between groups was a duplicate, ie, received an insulin-based regimen at first and then changed treatment to DPP4i or an alternate treatment.

All patients included in the study provided written informed consent for use of their historical clinical data, and this protocol was approved by the local ethics committee on human research and is in accordance with the Helsinki Declaration as revised in 2000. All patients were followed for at least 1 year after diagnosis by measurement of fasting blood glucose (FBG) levels, HbA1c, renal function (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] was calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration formula), plasma trough levels of immunosuppressive drugs, lipids, and body weight. Details of clinical and demographic information such as age, sex, body mass index (BMI, calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), family history of diabetes, cause of end-stage renal disease, and concomitant medication were also collected and are presented in Table 1.

Statistical analyses

Continuous variables are presented as mean values with SD and range of values as appropriate. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used for normality analysis of the quantitative variables. Comparisons of changes were made between the values at NODAT diagnosis before DPP4i treatment initiation and the mean value of each examined parameter of the last 6 months of the 12-month posttreatment period. These comparisons were performed with the paired t test or the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed rank test in case of violation of normality between patients in the same treatment group and with the simple t test or the Mann-Whitney test between patients in different treatment groups. Statistical analyses were perfor­med with GraphPad software (version 5.03).

Results

Overall, 12 patients (11 men) with a mean age of 59.4 ± 12 years at NODAT diagnosis who received DPP4i and 5 patients (4 men) with a mean age of 53.6 ± 10.1 years who received insulin as first treatments for NODAT were included in the study. All included patients received a deceased donor kidney transplant performed by the same surgical team at the same transplant center. The DPP4i were prescribed as follows: linagliptin in 4 patients, sitagliptin in 4 patients, vildagliptin in 2 patients, and alogliptin in 2 patients. Insulin-based treatment regimens for each patient are presented in Table 2. Nine of 12 patients who received DPP4i and 3 of 5 who received insulin were treated with tacrolimus-based immunosuppression.

Safety of treatment

Renal function remained stable after the initiation of treatment with DPP4i (mean serum creatinine from 1.39 ± 0.36 to 1.34 ± 0.45 mg/dL [P = .48, not significant] and eGFR from 58.83 ± 16.9 to 61.73 ± 19.9 mL/min/1.73 m2 [P = .14, not significant]) (Figure 1). Plasma tacrolimus trough levels were not affected after DPP4i initiation (from 6.2 ± 1.37 to 5.5 ± 1.13 ng/mL; P = .07, not significant). The mean dose of tacrolimus at 1 year after initiation of DPP4i treatment was slightly lower than baseline (from 2.9 ± 1.4 to 2.6 ± 0.97 mg/24 h; P = .54, not significant). The insignificant decrease in tacrolimus trough levels could be attributed to the reduction of tacrolimus dose, consistent with per protocol immunosuppression reduction during follow-up (Figure 2).

Efficacy of treatment

The mean FBG level at the time of diabetes onset was 114.5 ± 25.4 mg/dL, whereas 1 year after the initiation of DPP4i treatment the mean FBG level was 111.1 ± 14.7 mg/dL (P = .77, not significant). The mean HbA1c value at the time of diagnosis was 6.6 ± 0.7%, whereas 1 year after treatment with DPP4i the mean value had decreased to 6.1 ± 0.7% (P = .03) (Figure 3).

Effect of treatment on lipids profile, weight, and blood pressure

No significant differences in total, low-density lipoprotein, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were observed after initiation of treatment. Nevertheless, triglyceride levels decreased signifi­cantly (from 214.4 ± 83 to 174.9 ± 75 mg/dL; P = .0039) (Figure 4). Statistically nonsignificant weight loss was observed in 8 of the 12 patients who received DPP4i (from 79.9 ± 12.3 to 77.9 ± 12.7 kg; P = .37, not significant) (Figure 5). Blood pressure, both systolic and diastolic, was not significantly altered during the posttreatment period compared with pretreatment values in patients who received DPP4i (systolic blood pressure, from 132.5 ± 18.8 to 132.9 ± 14.8 mm Hg [P = .76, not significant]; diastolic blood pressure, from 78.8 ± 9.9 to 79.6 ± 6.6 mm Hg [P = .25, not significant]) (Figure 6).

Comparison of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors versus standard insulin-based treatment

There were no differences in basic clinical characteristics, comorbidities, risk factors, and immunosuppression regimen between patients who received insulin and those who received DPP4i (Table 1). Patients treated with DPP4i achieved lower HbA1c levels than patients treated with insulin (6.1 ± 0.65% vs 7.1 ± 0.2%, respectively; P = .01). The reduction in HbA1c was greater in patients treated with DPP4i (?HbA1c, -0.5 ± 0.6% vs -0.03 ± 0.85%, respectively; P = .22, not significant) (Figure 7).

Side effects

No side effects, including hypoglycemia or acute rejection episodes, were reported during the follow-up period of more than 12 months, and no patient discontinued the prescribed DPP4i treatment. None of the study participants reported symptoms that could be attributed to DPP4i, including nausea.

For those patients who were treated with an insulin-based regimen, although we could not retrieve any historical data on daily blood glucose home measurements, we were able to assess all medical records (from physician notes to serum biochemistry) at every scheduled and unscheduled follow-up visit. These records indicated that only 1 patient (patient 5 as shown in Table 2) experienced hypoglycemic episodes during the night, and her regimen was changed appropriately.

Discussion

The main findings of our study highlight the safety and effectiveness of DPP4i in the treatment of NODAT in kidney transplant recipients. Kidney function (as expressed with eGFR) and immunosup­pression trough levels were not affected by DPP4i, and adequate control of diabetes was achieved. Moreover, DPP4i were able to provide better control of diabetes than insulin therapy, possibly because of better compliance.

Hyperglycemia is associated with adverse long-term outcomes in renal allograft recipients with diabetes, and glycemic control is an important factor to prevent graft loss.25,26 Recent data have demonstrated that impaired insulin secretion, rather than increased insulin resistance, is a key factor in the development of NODAT.17 As a result, an antidiabetic agent that protects beta cells could be the optimal therapy for transplant recipients with diabetes.27 Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors constitute a class of antidiabetic drugs that stabilize the incretin hormones glucagon-like peptide 1 and glucose inhibitory peptide, which result in improved metabolic control and reduction of postprandial hyperglycemia and less risk of hypoglycemic episodes.23

In our study, the mean FBG level at the time of diabetes onset was 114.5 mg/dL, whereas 1 year after the initiation of DPP4i treatment the mean FBG level was down to 111.1 mg/dL. According to Halden and colleagues, the median FBG was significantly lower after 4 weeks of sitagliptin treatment. Moreover, sitagliptin treatment also resulted in significant and consistent reductions in at-home measurements of plasma glucose throughout the day.28 Nevertheless, in the study of Haidinger and colleagues, vildagliptin did not result in significantly lower FGB compared with placebo.29 As for HbA1c, in our present study, the mean value at the time of diagnosis was 6.6%, whereas after 1 year of treatment with DPP4i it had significantly decreased to 6.1%. This result is consistent with the results of a study by Boerner and colleagues, in which HbA1c was significantly improved at the end of 6 months, with effect persisting at 12 months of follow-up.30 Similarly, Haidinger and colleagues demonstrated a significant reduction in HbA1c in patients treated with vildagliptin compared with placebo.29

Our results showed that DPP4i treatment has no detrimental renal effects, because kidney function had remained stable 1 year after the initiation of treatment. Similarly, no difference in kidney function was observed in the studies of Haidinger, Boerner, Halden, and colleagues.28-30 More specifically, in the study by Halden and colleagues, in which patients followed a crossover treatment schedule and were randomized to first receive either sitagliptin at 50 to 100 mg/day or a sitagliptin-free period of 4 weeks, the mean baseline creatinine did not change significantly between the on-treatment or off-treatment periods.28 More importantly, no acute rejection episodes were reported in any of the aforementioned studies.

Furthermore, in the study by Boerner and colleagues, there was a modest but significant decrease in BMI after 12 months of follow-up, although this decrease may have been the result of multiple factors, including lifestyle modifications.30 In our study, we also observed a considerable mean weight loss of 2 kg during a 12-month period, but this was not statistically significant. In another study by Halden and colleagues, there was no effect on patient weight with the addition of DPP4i in the treatment of NODAT.28,30 With regard to effects of DPP4i on the patient lipids profiles, no differences in high-density and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were observed in either our study or the study by Boerner and colleagues, whereas triglyceride levels in our study decreased significantly.30

Hypertension is an important cause of chronic kidney disease and a common clinical feature of kidney transplant recipients. In addition to the hypoglycemic effect, DPP4i have also shown potent actions on the cardiovascular system, particularly in the regulation of blood pressure. The molecular mechanism that underlies the antihypertensive effect of DPP4i is multifactorial and may involve neuropeptide Y and peptide YY. According to Ogawa and colleagues, an alternate day treatment with sitagliptin significantly reduced systolic blood pressure in Japanese patients with hypertension and type 2 diabetes.31 Nevertheless, according to Haidinger and colleagues, vildagliptin compared with placebo failed to reduce blood pressure in patients with NODAT.29 Moreover, in the study by Halden and colleagues, sitagliptin had no significant effects on median systolic and diastolic blood pressure.28 Likewise, in our study, we did not observe any significant differences in systolic or diastolic pressure of our DPP4i-treated patients.

In solid-organ transplant recipients, drug-drug interactions and adverse effects of medications on graft function are of great importance when considering medications to treat comorbid conditions. In our study, plasma tacrolimus trough levels were not affected after DPP4i initiation, whereas the mean dose of tacrolimus for 1 year after initiation of DPP4i treatment was slightly lower than baseline. The insignificant decrease in tacrolimus trough levels could be attributed to the reduction of tacrolimus dose consistent with per protocol immunosup­pression reduction during follow-up. Similarly, in the studies by Boerner and colleagues and Halden and colleagues, there was no difference in tacrolimus trough levels in patients treated with sitagliptin.28,30 Although the safety profile of each member of the DPP4i family could not be assessed in this study because of the inadequate number of recipients for each drug, we could not detect any important interaction of either the immunosuppression regimen or the standard-of-care treatment with statins and antihypertensive drugs. Nevertheless, in 1 study in which DPP4i were administered in kidney transplant recipients on cyclosporine, cyclosporine trough levels were significantly increased in those treated with sitagliptin, but these were minimally changed in those who received linagliptin.32 Finally, it is worth noting that sitagliptin is primarily eliminated in an unchanged form in the urine, and a relatively small portion is metabolized by the hepatic cytochrome P450 3A4 and 2C8 systems; in contrast, linagliptin is mainly eliminated unchanged via the feces, and renal excretion only accounts for 5.4% of elimination.32

For the efficacy of different treatment protocols for NODAT, we are not aware of any other comparative studies on DPP4i versus insulin. In this retrospective study, we were able to compare 2 groups of patients who received the aforementioned regimens; however, we acknowledge that the number of patients who received insulin was limited, and this severely limits the power of any significant clinical findings. Nevertheless, the inclusion of such an arm in this study highlights the importance and effectiveness of new treatments for diabetes in patients with NODAT outside of standard insulin therapy, especially in patients with established chronic kidney disease (such as kidney transplant recipients).

Unfortunately, we were not able to show differences in the safety profile or effectiveness among the different DPP4i prescriptions because of the low number of patients included in the study. Thus, we must emphasize that these results regarding DPP4i should be evaluated as a group effect. Moreover, the lack of randomization of treatment modalities either between DPP4i and other oral antidiabetic agents or between DPP4i and insulin treatment does not allow definitive conclusions on efficacy. Nevertheless, despite the retrospective nature of this study, we were able to monitor medication prescription changes, laboratory values, and reports of potential side effects and transplant-related comorbid events. Finally, the inclusion of a small group of patients who received an insulin-based regimen, albeit an acknowledged limitation of this study, can demonstrate the efficacy of treatment with DPP4i in NODAT.

In conclusion, we have shown that DPP4i were effective as monotherapy in kidney transplant recipients who developed NODAT. Also, these were  well tolerated, and both kidney function and immunosuppression levels remained stable during the 12 months of treatment, with the advantageous avoidance of hypoglycemic episodes.


References:

  1. Suthanthiran M, Strom TB. Renal transplantation. N Engl J Med. 1994;331(6):365-376. doi:10.1056/NEJM199408113310606
    CrossRef - PubMed
  2. Schiel R, Heinrich S, Steiner T, Ott U, Stein G. Long-term prognosis of patients after kidney transplantation: a comparison of those with or without diabetes mellitus. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2005;20(3):611-617. doi.org/10.1093/ndt/gfh657
    CrossRef - PubMed
  3. Palepu S, Prasad GV. New-onset diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation: current status and future directions. World J Diabetes. 2015;6(3):445-455. doi:10.4239/wjd.v6.i3.445
    CrossRef - PubMed
  4. Pham PT, Pham PM, Pham SV, Pham PA, Pham PC. New onset diabetes after transplantation (NODAT): an overview. Diabetes Metab Syndr Obes. 2011;4:175-186. doi:10.2147/DMSO.S19027
    CrossRef - PubMed
  5. Kasiske BL, Snyder JJ, Gilbertson D, Matas AJ. Diabetes mellitus after kidney transplantation in the United States. Am J Transplant. 2003;3(2):178-185. doi:10.1034/j.1600-6143.2003.00010.x
    CrossRef - PubMed
  6. Rodrigo E, Fernandez-Fresnedo G, Valero R, et al. New-onset diabetes after kidney transplantation: risk factors. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2006;17(12 Suppl 3):S291-S295. doi:10.1681/ASN.2006080929
    CrossRef - PubMed
  7. de Mattos AM, Olyaei AJ, Prather JC, Golconda MS, Barry JM, Norman DJ. Autosomal-dominant polycystic kidney disease as a risk factor for diabetes mellitus following renal transplantation. Kidney Int. 2005;67(2):714-720. doi:10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.67132.x
    CrossRef - PubMed
  8. Chakkera HA, Weil EJ, Swanson CM, et al. Pretransplant risk score for new-onset diabetes after kidney transplantation. Diabetes Care. 2011;34(10):2141-2145. doi:10.2337/dc11-0752
    CrossRef - PubMed
  9. Johnston O, Rose CL, Webster AC, Gill JS. Sirolimus is associated with new-onset diabetes in kidney transplant recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19(7):1411-1418. doi:10.1681/ASN.2007111202
    CrossRef - PubMed
  10. Radu RG, Fujimoto S, Mukai E, et al. Tacrolimus suppresses glucose-induced insulin release from pancreatic islets by reducing glucokinase activity. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2005;288(2):E365-E371. doi:10.1152/ajpendo.00390.2004
    CrossRef - PubMed
  11. Israni AK, Snyder JJ, Skeans MA, Kasiske BL, Investigators P. Clinical diagnosis of metabolic syndrome: predicting new-onset diabetes, coronary heart disease, and allograft failure late after kidney transplant. Transpl Int. 2012;25(7):748-757. doi:10.1111/j.1432-2277.2012.01488.x
    CrossRef - PubMed
  12. Hjelmesaeth J, Sagedal S, Hartmann A, et al. Asymptomatic cytomegalovirus infection is associated with increased risk of new-onset diabetes mellitus and impaired insulin release after renal transplantation. Diabetologia. 2004;47(9):1550-1556. doi:10.1007/s00125-004-1499-z
    CrossRef - PubMed
  13. Fabrizi F, Martin P, Dixit V, Bunnapradist S, Kanwal F, Dulai G. Post-transplant diabetes mellitus and HCV seropositive status after renal transplantation: meta-analysis of clinical studies. Am J Transplant. 2005;5(10):2433-2440. doi:10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01040.x
    CrossRef - PubMed
  14. Sharif A, Hecking M, de Vries AP, et al. Proceedings from an international consensus meeting on posttransplantation diabetes mellitus: recommendations and future directions. Am J Transplant. 2014;14(9):1992-2000. doi:10.1111/ajt.12850
    CrossRef - PubMed

  15. Sharif A, Baboolal K. Diagnostic application of the A(1c) assay in renal disease. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;21(3):383-385. doi:10.1681/ASN.2010010031
    CrossRef - PubMed
  16. Inzucchi SE. Diagnosis of diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(2):193. doi:10.1056/NEJMc1212738
    CrossRef - PubMed
  17. Hecking M, Kainz A, Werzowa J, et al. Glucose metabolism after renal transplantation. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(9):2763-2771. doi:10.2337/dc12-2441
    CrossRef - PubMed
  18. Zelle DM, Corpeleijn E, Deinum J, et al. Pancreatic beta-cell dysfunction and risk of new-onset diabetes after kidney transplantation. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(7):1926-1932. doi:10.2337/dc12-1894
    CrossRef - PubMed
  19. Sharif A, de Vries AP, Porrini E, Hecking M, Saemann M; European-New-Onset Diabetes After Transplantation Working Group. Clinical trials for treatment of NODAT: time to collaborate. Transplantation. 2012;94(4):e23-e24; author reply e24-e25. doi:10.1097/TP.0b013e318260b1e9
    CrossRef - PubMed
  20. Sharif A. Metformin for patients with diabetes and concomitant renal restrictions: is there an evidence base? QJM. 2013;106(3):291-294. doi:10.1093/qjmed/hct016
    CrossRef - PubMed
  21. Delea TE, Edelsberg JS, Hagiwara M, Oster G, Phillips LS. Use of thiazolidinediones and risk of heart failure in people with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective cohort study. Diabetes Care. 2003;26(11):2983-2989. doi:10.2337/diacare.26.11.2983
    CrossRef - PubMed
  22. Shin MS, Yu JH, Jung CH, et al. The duration of sulfonylurea treatment is associated with beta-cell dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2012;14(11):1033-1042. doi:10.1089/dia.2012.0144
    CrossRef - PubMed

  23. Richter B, Bandeira-Echtler E, Bergerhoff K, Lerch CL. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008;(2):CD006739. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD006739.pub2
    CrossRef - PubMed
  24. Vaghasiya J, Sheth N, Bhalodia Y, Manek R. Sitagliptin protects renal ischemia reperfusion induced renal damage in diabetes. Regul Pept. 2011;166(1-3):48-54. doi:10.1016/j.regpep.2010.08.007
    CrossRef - PubMed
  25. Valderhaug TG, Hjelmesaeth J, Hartmann A, et al. The association of early post-transplant glucose levels with long-term mortality. Diabetologia. 2011;54(6):1341-1349. doi:10.1007/s00125-011-2105-9
    CrossRef - PubMed
  26. Thomas MC, Mathew TH, Russ GR. Glycaemic control and graft loss following renal transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2001;16(10):1978-1982. doi:10.1093/ndt/16.10.1978
    CrossRef - PubMed
  27. Hamamoto S, Kanda Y, Shimoda M, et al. Vildagliptin preserves the mass and function of pancreatic beta cells via the developmental regulation and suppression of oxidative and endoplasmic reticulum stress in a mouse model of diabetes. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013;15(2):153-163. doi:10.1111/dom.12005
    CrossRef - PubMed
  28. Strom Halden TA, Asberg A, Vik K, Hartmann A, Jenssen T. Short-term efficacy and safety of sitagliptin treatment in long-term stable renal recipients with new-onset diabetes after transplantation. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2014;29(4):926-933. doi:10.1093/ndt/gft536
    CrossRef - PubMed
  29. Haidinger M, Werzowa J, Hecking M, et al. Efficacy and safety of vildagliptin in new-onset diabetes after kidney transplantation: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Am J Transplant. 2014;14(1):115-123. doi:10.1111/ajt.12518
    CrossRef - PubMed

  30. Boerner BP, Miles CD, Shivaswamy V. Efficacy and safety of sitagliptin for the treatment of new-onset diabetes after renal transplantation. Int J Endocrinol. 2014;2014:617638. doi:10.1155/2014/617638
    CrossRef - PubMed
  31. Ogawa S, Ishiki M, Nako K, et al. Sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, decreases systolic blood pressure in Japanese hypertensive patients with type 2 diabetes. Tohoku J Exp Med. 2011;223(2):133-135. doi:10.1620/tjem.223.133
    CrossRef - PubMed
  32. Bae J, Lee MJ, Choe EY, et al. Effects of dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitors on hyperglycemia and blood cyclosporine levels in renal transplant patients with diabetes: a pilot study. Endocrinol Metab (Seoul). 2016;31(1):161-167. doi:10.3803/EnM.2016.31.1.161
    CrossRef - PubMed


Volume : 19
Issue : 5
Pages : 411 - 419
DOI : 10.6002/ect.2020.0519


PDF VIEW [746] KB.
FULL PDF VIEW

From the Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospital of Patras, Patras, Greece
Acknowledgements: The authors have not received any funding or grants in support of the presented research or for the preparation of this work and have no declarations of potential conflicts of interest.
Corresponding author: Dimitrios S. Goumenos, Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospital of Patras, Patras 265 00, Greece
Phone: +30 2613 603 361 
E-mail: dgoumenos@upatras.gr